Intent: Australia Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2009, not for curiosity or malice; but - ‘protection of the network’


First 1 of 4 paragraphs shown

 Senator Ludlam, 2 Feb 2010, the  Attorney-General claims that network protection duties vary for each network and therefore cannot be defined. Ludlam argued as “the purpose of this bill is to define network protection duties and give them effect, ..we believe ...parameters should be set”. . One of these was to define “network protection duties to remove any remaining ambiguity”.   ...Log in to read rest of Article or image.
(2010-02-05)

Please log in to see references.

Article in: [EWN Publishing]
Article Tags: [ Human Rights ][ Security ]


Related Articles
Australian Network managers and ISPs act as government and corporate spies in Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2009 approach | Extension of Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2009 makes temporary Australian “terrorism” law, permanent | Intent: Australia Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2009, not for curiosity or malice; but - ‘protection of the network’ | Australian Agencies keep all personal and business records trawled, for ever and ever |

Media Mogul Toolbox

Get Weekly Volume

RSS Feed

(Log In to access search functions.)